I also disagree that the system of harvesting organs would not be abused. Of course it would as every area of human endeavour has been corrupted by the criminally intended and this would provide many opportunities for unintended consequences up to to and including state and government misuse of body parts
Call me naïve but I think more of our NHS than this.
“Presumed consent” has been the case in Wales, has it not?
Has anybody noticed the dramatic rise in the death rate? No, I didn’t think so.
The one thing that bothers me is that the U.K. is way down the donor league table with 14 donors per million of population compared to 34 PMP in Spain, 27 PMP in Belgium and 23 PMP in France .
Type 2 Diabetes along with an ageing population are both factors in exacerbating the demand for organs, currently expanding at a rate of 8% per year. The resulting mortality rates for patients awaiting organ transplant mean that on average 500 patients die each year while waiting for a “deceased” organ.
So there is a problem.
To all those who shudder at the prospect of donating their or a loved ones organs, how would you address that? Just shrugging our shoulders and tutting is not going to be enough.
Gransnet forums
Chat
Presumed Consent
(204 Posts)I've just been reading about this and it looks like presumed consent for organ donation is going ahead nationwide.
I find myself with mixed emotions somehow. I know there are a lot of people desperate for new hearts and other organs but, somehow, I'm uncomfortable with the notion that the bodies of dear departed ones can be 'reaped' in this way unless they have opted out. Whose body is it after death? I trust that hospital staff will be trained to be as kind and tactful as possible.
I have such clear memories of a phone call I took from a patient of my Dad's after her son's car accident. Her distress was desperate. 'They want his kidneys and his eyes' is her phrase that has never left me. Poor woman. She felt that 'they' wouldn't do their best to save her son as they had uses for his body parts. A horrible discussion. Sorry everyone. I know I shouldn't be thinking like this but I am. 
I'm also well aware of people needing transplants. I wish that opt in was continuing rather than opt out.
I have no trouble with my organs being used to save someone decent but I would certainly object to, for instance, a murderer’s life being prolonged with my precious body.
I also disagree that the system of harvesting organs would not be abused. Of course it would as every area of human endeavour has been corrupted by the criminally intended and this would provide many opportunities for unintended consequences up to to and including state and government misuse of body parts.
In China, when there are big political conferences, they move prisoners into the area and set up transplants for the delegates:- a murderous harvest indeed.
So, while I am generally pro donations and would make them myself, I think the question of presumed consent is fraught with moral difficulties.
quizqueen None of us should have power over life and death, where do you draw the line? It smacks of Nazi Germany where only those whom the government deemed worthy received treatment.
In my working life I will continue to treat whoever regardless of their views/lifestyle or any crimes that they may have committed. I would not be able to face myself if I didn’t fight for all my patients life’s with equal passion. To do otherwise would make me less than human.
I carry a donor card and am signed up online. But I am weirdly annoyed with this new idea. It is my body, or my loved ones. Someone needs to speak to someone, even if only quickly, about what to do. Yes, once you’re dead etc. For me, I’m not worried. (And they probably won’t want my aged organs). I would like a bit of consultation before they harvest one of kids, though.
I don’t see the problem with opting out. It’s just the reverse of opting in. If you can’t be bothered to opt out which probably will be quite easy through your Dr hopeful. Then your organs can be used. I can’t believe that Drs would let you die just to use your organs. Hopefully I’m right on that one. Many people die because people don’t opt in, but wouldn’t mind if it came to it
one 'gives' too many!
We had a talk at U3A from a man who had received a heart donation. It was fascinating. He was so grateful that he raises money for the transplant hospital by giving these talks. he also gives regularly gives talks to medical students about what it is like from the patients' point of view, which helps their training.
Thanks Chucky - I totally understand your sadness alongside relief. 
quizqueen
Where would you draw the line or are animal abusers and terrorists on the blacklist but wife beaters, robbers, addicts and drink-drivers etc who kill other road users, are ok?
It's a good job we don't know to whom we donate.
Miepl
That's wonderful. 24 years of donating. If only everyone did that.
Dictatorship! ??? Just read the info. You can opt out!
www.organdonation.nhs.uk/all-about-opt-out/
I think it would be pretty mean to opt out but, if push came to shove and you yourself needed a transplant, to then hope someone's family would donate their loved one's organs to help you live, would be utterly selfish.
Well that’s all right then isn’t it?
Two friends and I were discussing this earlier today and we all think,independently, that it is wrong to presume organ donation. We all thought that it smacks of dictatorship and not the way things should be done.
Where do we opt out of “presumed consent”?
Fortunately, most people do not abuse other people or animals, or commit terrorist acts, so the chance that a person's organs will be transplanted into a murderer or terrorist are, I think, pretty remote.
In any case, people who give blood don't know who that blood will be transfused into. Using your rationale quizqueen, on the offchance that somebody who had committed dreadful acts might benefit, nobody would donate anything - for medical purposes or indeed to any organisation that helps people.
Who are you quizqueen you set yourself up as the judge of who is worthy of life and death?
I despair of such arrogance and lack of humanity and thank. God that our doctors and nurses do not play God in the way you aspire to.
This is becoming less and less like the Gransnet I signed up to.
My personal opinion is that organ donation should continue to be voluntary and consent should not be presumed. My daughter carries a card but I am against it and will opt out for myself. My reason being is that I would hate to take the chance that my organs could be donated to someone I deemed undeserving, like an abuser of animals or a terrorist, and I would not want to think I had helped them to live a minute longer .
That's not actually what I meant B9exchange but it is horrifying.
I just wonder if in the long term a govt could presume that a person should give up eg a kidney rather than choose to.
The altruistic donors I referred to are people who decide to donate an organ while still alive to a complete stranger.
My husband was killed in a road accident. We both carried donor cards but in the shock of his sudden and unexpected death I was numb. I will always be grateful for the woman police officer who asked me if he had a donor card. Being able to donate heart valves and corneas helped us all as a family to find something positive in such devastating . circumstances. Also we were contacted several times over the next few months telling us that the donations had been successful. We were so grateful for the police officer.
JAne10 is this what you are worried about?
"The WHO estimated in 2007 that organ trafficking accounts for 5-10% of kidney transplants performed annually across the globe, and that in India, around 2,000 Indians sell a kidney every year.
In 2001, a survey was conducted among 305 individuals who had sold a kidney in Chennai by a team of four doctors—Madhav Goyal, Ravindra L. Mehta, Lawrence J. Schneiderman, Ashwini R. Sehgal. “Ninety-six per cent of participants sold their kidneys to pay off debts. The average amount received was $1070. Most of the money received was spent on debts, food, and clothing," said a report titled Economic and Health Consequences of Selling a Kidney in India published in The Journal of the American Medical Association on 2 October 2002."
It is certainly dreadful that the poverty stricken are forced into live organ donation in order to feed their children.
I hope and pray no father in this Country puts their child in for a routine operation and finds later that one of their kidneys has been removed for donation, but as long as there is no financial benefit to the donor, at least we avoid that.
Thank you for your eloquent post chucky 
First some background information.
My husband was diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy. Within several weeks of first going to the doctor he was lying in a hospital bed and we were told he would die without a transplant. He received his heart transplant 6 days later. That was over 10 years ago.
Prior to this I can remember a young boy on television, with his parents. They were desperate for a transplant as he would die without it. He received a transplant and he was back on television with his parents saying how happy they were!! I can remember being appalled with the celebration over another child dying, so theirs could live!
My reaction was very different to this. I found it very difficult to be happy about my husband’s transplant, as for it to happen, some other family had lost their loved one. When everyone sent best wishes and said how happy they were, I really struggled. I know that person would have died anyway but I could not feel joy at someone else’s loss.
We are grateful for the gift that he was given, because that is what it was, a very special gift! I have often lit a candle in church for his anonymous donor and I have prayed for both him and his family.
The extra time my husband received has seen him able to walk his daughter down the aisle, see both myself and daughter graduate from university and get to know his grandchildren.
Despite this I disagree with presumed consent. The gift of an organ, should be a choice, not a case of reaping someone’s body when they die, without any thought to what they or their relatives wanted. It is their body, nobody else’s! What right does anyone else have to steal what belongs to someone else?
I am not against donation, I have been on the organ donor register for over 30 years, but that is because I want to be! I have spoken to my family about my decision and about their wishes should they die. This is what should happen, people need to make their choices clear. It shouldn’t be up to anyone else, other than you and your family what happens to your body after you die!
I agree with what you are saying about presuned consent, but pardon me for appearing ignorant- live donation?
Sigh. I know organ donation is a good thing.
My concern, and why I started this thread, is this position of presumed consent. Maybe if I trusted the state more fully I'd not mind but it could be a slippery slope. I'd hoped people might have picked up on the potential for presumed consent to live donation. Whose bodies are ours anyway? Oh well.
Carry a donor card. Sign whatever, tell your family your wishes. But don't just presume its OK. It just might not be.
Go for the positive choice don't legally enforce a negative one.
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »

