Reading some of these comments has made my blood boil ?. How good it must be, not to have to walk a mile in the worn-down shoes of those who need to use a Foodbank.
I also give a couple of bags of groceries, hygiene products, etc to our local Foodbank each week. My DH used to work for a poultry firm, and we get eggs at a reduced price, so a dozen or so gets taken along, too. A person (client) is allowed 3 eggs. I usually include pet food, too, because this is as much a necessity as is family food. One checkout assistant commented on the amount of pet food I’d included in my shopping, and I replied that most of it was for the Foodbank. Her reply was similar to an earlier poster’s about children - ‘They shouldn’t have pets if they can’t afford them’. She just about got her head in her hands. Without the comfortable presence of a much-loved pet, a lonely life might just about be pointless for some.
I also take clothes to the Foodbank that would normally go to the charity shop. If a person can’t afford food, then they can’t afford to buy clothes from a charity shop either.
We’re not encouraging laziness by helping people who have little, we’re sharing what we have. Anyway, what right have any of us to judge others, when we really don’t know their story?