Gransnet forums

Chat

Queen Camilla

(419 Posts)
mrsmopp Thu 23-Feb-17 23:12:34

Prince Charles is campaigning for Camilla to be Queen Camilla when he becomes King. I would not like her to be Queen. I think they both behaved appallingly in carrying on their affair when they were both married to someone else. They had no concern for the hurt, upset and heartbreak they caused Diana and Andrew PB. They just thought it was perfectly OK to act as they did. It's 80 years since Edward abdicated to marry a divorced woman, and Margaret was not able to marry Peter Townsend, even though she was unlikely to ascend the throne. So what rules have changed? He has what he wanted and married her, but making her Queen is condoning their adultery.
But I think I'm in the minority in my view.

trisher Fri 24-Feb-17 21:54:13

stillalive and kicking I always understood that Philip had a thing for shopgirls.

stillaliveandkicking Fri 24-Feb-17 21:44:39

And don't tell me Diana didn't know about Camilla and Charles or the in's and out's of it all. Any normal person wouldn't have touched him with a barge pole let alone marry him. Darling Di knew exactly what she was getting into and let's face it, she had enough affairs herself smile)

DaisyDog Fri 24-Feb-17 21:43:07

Of course Diana was 'country set' as are her children and Camilla. We have a disagreement here in my home, about Kate. Middletons - country set or not?

willsmadnan Fri 24-Feb-17 21:36:20

So, Diana wasn't one of the 'county set' Azie09 . She was the daughter of Earl Spencer, a direct descendant of the Duke of Marlborough. How 'county' can you get? LMAO!

stillaliveandkicking Fri 24-Feb-17 21:29:20

from not by - just in case any pendants are about smile

stillaliveandkicking Fri 24-Feb-17 21:27:07

I agree with Annie on her last post. He has learned by both parents and chosen to do the opposite of their wrongs.

Anniebach Fri 24-Feb-17 21:23:08

Oh deary me , the windsors are country set , William and Harry included, calling them upper class twits after praising them is strange

As to how William parents his children is due to Diana, true, he keeps his children away from the cameras after a childhood when his mother paraded him for the press.

DaisyDog Fri 24-Feb-17 21:22:38

Yes, the sainted Diana, a poor girl from below the lower income levels. Certainly not raised at all as Camilla in gentry.

stillaliveandkicking Fri 24-Feb-17 21:22:15

Exactly Daisy, but the end the day Im not a pious prig and believe that we are all human, sometimes good people do bad things and unless you actually walk in the other persons shoes, who are you to cast outright condemnation/judgement. I personally don't give a frig what people do behind closed doors unless of course there's outright abuse involved.

DaisyDog Fri 24-Feb-17 21:16:26

stillaliveandkicking Wonderful!!!!!! That others should be as liberal.

DaisyDog Fri 24-Feb-17 21:13:57

Shame on Camilla for what she did? Didn't Charles participate? Who are we to say if Windsors should be adulterers or not?

stillaliveandkicking Fri 24-Feb-17 21:10:49

You'd be surprised then these days Daisy, Im on POF and dating with a view to a having another sexual relationship grin

stillaliveandkicking Fri 24-Feb-17 21:09:07

And Diana wasn't then, she was just a normal everyday person grin

DaisyDog Fri 24-Feb-17 21:08:30

Usually MNetter age when married, at least Lizzie and di were in that age bracket. GNetters aren't usually looking to hook up.

Azie09 Fri 24-Feb-17 21:06:34

William, Kate and Harry have restored my faith in the monarchy and I was never a royalist! However William and Harry have become fine young men, I think they're a credit to their mother and everything about them says they were loved, especially by her, their mother. You can see it, particularly in how William parents.

So all credit to Diana who was treated badly by the rest of the Royals. Hence I think Camella should not become Queen, she behaved badly, she's one of the county set, the kind of upper class twits who have no idea how ordinary people manage and mostly they don't care. She is the past and the Royals have Diana to thank for the resurgence of interest in a monarchy today.

That's my pennyworth!

stillaliveandkicking Fri 24-Feb-17 21:05:37

So what. It's all under the same umbrella. Maybe she's on both, it's allowed you know.

Ana Fri 24-Feb-17 21:04:22

Because this isn't Mumsnet. It's Gransnet. hmm

stillaliveandkicking Fri 24-Feb-17 21:02:25

Whilst we aren't on mumsnet we are on a site run by the same so why are you picking Daisy up on this Ana? It's no big deal.

Ana Fri 24-Feb-17 21:00:24

We're not Mumsnetters, DaisyDog. Are you on the wrong site?

stillaliveandkicking Fri 24-Feb-17 20:57:32

Never wise to put anyone on a pedestal. We are all human beings at the end of the day but I love what they represent and always will.

stillaliveandkicking Fri 24-Feb-17 20:54:48

Yes they do. They set us apart and bring in rather a lot of revenue.

It's well known that artists used to shag their "muse" so whilst there isn't a definition and just a general saying on my behalf. I will let you contemplate/make up the rest mrsmopp.

Luckylegs9 Fri 24-Feb-17 20:52:13

Grandmama, why do you say Diana should not have married Charles. She loved him, she didn't know he already had Camilla willingly on the back burner. Can you cast your mind back to your wedding day, when you married the man you loved and trusted. How would you have felt if your husband had someone else before the wedding cake was cut. She was publicly humiliated. What ever you say about Diana she didn't deserve that, she was a great mom and Had a natural way with everyone she met. Camilla might have tied the line since her wedding to Charles, but Shane on her fir what she did.

DaisyDog Fri 24-Feb-17 20:51:48

Royals adulterous? Do tell. Charles nervous and bright married to a dreary dunce? Do tell. Harry wild and crazy? Do tell. Phil the Greek? Who would suit every MNetter? Nobody.

merlotgran Fri 24-Feb-17 20:50:11

I really don't think the Queen and Prince Philip had an arranged marriage.

Ana Fri 24-Feb-17 20:49:37

Lord Mountbatten was a great influence on Charles's early life as well, and had strong ideas about what sort of a wife he should choose.

Of course he wasn't around when Charles actually met and married Diana, I'm not sure whether that was a good thing or not, tbh...