Gransnet forums

Chat

Have you made your mind up about the referendum?

(530 Posts)
obieone Thu 19-May-16 08:36:16

Yes.

I am curious to know how many have. Personally I do not read much about it any more, nor talk about it as dont see the point.

Gracesgran Tue 24-May-16 08:53:32

I have just listened to the most grown-up interview I have heard about in/out by Steve Hilton on "Today". He made it clear that he didn't believe one side was all right and the other all wrong. I have been a leaning voter - leaning towards in, he is backing the out campaign. When he said he got 75% "out" on the test on his site Crowdpac I heaved a sigh of relief that this was not another interview where the interviewee proclaims his side it accompanied by angels and the other comes straight from the devil grin Those interviews are very tiresome and get us no further forward.

I did the test and got 77% in. I have not been prepared to say I was In or Out on this thread but 77% in feels very comfortable to me. If you want to do the test it is here.

annsixty Tue 24-May-16 08:24:53

DT is so biased it would say anything. We have read it for many years but regardless of our views we are shocked by it's stance.

GandTea Tue 24-May-16 07:23:25

LOL, Last night the BBC/ITV (can't remember which) had a survey which showed the exact opposite. Hey ho, toss a coin.

durhamjen Mon 23-May-16 23:38:26

Telegraph says that older people are now going to vote to stay in.

durhamjen Mon 23-May-16 23:37:21

Also there's the fact that they speak the language.

Yes, Pittcity, I hope the ASA gets involved in that Vote Leave broadcast. They have been told time and time again that those figures are wrong. I can imagine fullfact reporting them to the electoral commission.

fullfact.org/immigration/immigration-and-nhs-staff/

A fact report on NHS staff from the EU.

petra Mon 23-May-16 22:21:13

Welshwife They don't believe you when you tell them what's happening. They insist: " No, you are wrong, my friend gets this and this"

Welshwife Mon 23-May-16 20:18:49

The fact that it is not too difficult in UK is the fault of the UK govt not the EU but Cameron has negotiated a four year delay in paying any benefits with the new deal which has been agreed. That should take away some of the desire to move to UK.

petra Mon 23-May-16 19:54:10

No, you don't need to ask, Ana When asked "why not France?" They said it's difficult to work illegally in France if they needed to.

Welshwife Mon 23-May-16 19:45:20

And lies!! The film they showed of the NHS was just silly.

Pittcity Mon 23-May-16 19:34:46

Did you see the Vote Leave broadcast this evening? Blatant scaremongering....

Ana Mon 23-May-16 18:58:23

Where are they heading for? (or do I not need to ask...?)

petra Mon 23-May-16 18:56:06

Ive just come back from a trip to Spain visiting friends who live and work there.
A lot of Eastern Europeans are leaving Spain. When asked why, they said higher wages and benefits.

whitewave Mon 23-May-16 14:34:03

1

Day6 Mon 23-May-16 14:31:27

It would seem Osborne and Cameron's scaremongering is bogus and biased. (Mainly because they have vested interests in staying in the EU - like power, position, pay and wealth)

Iain Duncan Smith has hit back at Osborne's forecasts regarding economic doom and gloom should we leave the EU.

He pointed out the Treasury was stripped of its role in economic forecasting six years ago because its record was so poor.

The former work and pensions secretary, who quit the Cabinet in March, said: 'This Treasury document is not an honest assessment but a deeply biased view of the future and it should not be believed by anyone.

'It is a fact that we hand over £350 million a week to the EU.

'If we vote to leave we can take back control of that money and use it to help people here in Britain.'

Day6 Mon 23-May-16 13:54:12

Gangy 5 - "The likes of Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy are all suffering whilst they see others are prospering. Why is it that the EU is looking to pull in more of the poorer Eastern European nations??. Ultimatelty, this has to be a recipe for disaster."

I completely agree Gangy.

In acquiring the likes of desperately poor Albania, and ensuring EU finance is in place to allow it to happen, (we are paying for poor eastern European countries to access the EU) one must ask what is going on?

The EU is no longer a trading union. It is working to become the United States of Europe. It's about land mass and territory and power. That can be the only explanation, unless someone can explain how the EU benefits from encouraging exceedingly poor migrants to seek a future in the UK, France, Sweden etc.

It would seem the EU's mission is to open borders and share the spoils of established nations with the people of regions that have nothing, rather than making those regions more stable and keeping populations in place. This is encouraging migration, no two ways about it.

The EU encourages interdependency and migration. If all of a sudden you have thousands upon thousands of people accessing services, education, health care etc, it stands to reason that everyone suffers when services creak under the strain of trying to cope. How exactly are our families getting a good deal if that happens?

Wouldn't it make more sense to build schools, hospitals, factories and transport systems in Albania rather than encouraging Albanians to come here?

Perhaps it's all about anarchy in the UK? There are bodies that would welcome the collapse of established systems

I don't know of any schools or hospitals or bus depots or stations being built locally, or in my region of the UK. It would seem the existing system will have to serve more and more people when in fact the people needing a better life ought to be able to have it in their own country, if the nations of Europe really are philanthropic. They are not. The EU is promoting destabilising of all we hold dear.

jinglbellsfrocks Mon 23-May-16 13:49:13

No. (I wish we didn't have two threads on the this)

Day6 Mon 23-May-16 13:36:26

I have yet to see Brexit, The Movie on YouTube, but it is well worth a view apparently for those who aren't sure which way to vote.

(So I've been told by someone whose understanding of current affairs and politics I respect.)

Kennedy Mon 23-May-16 10:40:11

Still not sure. It is such an important issue. We must get it right at all costs. hmm

Kennedy Mon 23-May-16 10:37:54

Still not sure. It is such an important issue. We must get it right at all costs.

durhamjen Sun 22-May-16 23:27:17

europarltv.europa.eu/en.aspx

You can watch them, just as you can watch our own parliament. I quite often do watch ours, but only European if I know there is something I am interested in like TTIP or anything to do with the environment.

Day6 Sun 22-May-16 23:17:31

"You cannot just have one MEP for your area.
There are twelve constituencies and even the smallest has three. That's Northern Ireland. Wales has four. London has eight. Scotland and Yorkshire have six each."

That's hardly comforting.

Our MEPs never put their heads above the parapet. They are virtually unseen and unknown, and as to what they get up to on the continent, who knows? Unless I make it my mission to stalk them, they work pretty much anonymously, and maybe, not in my interests.

If cctv footage of the working lives of MEPs and their influence was made available, I imagine most of us would be outraged. Given their salaries and perks, it would make for very interesting viewing I suspect.

There is no accountability.

There will be no need for them if we decide to leave the EU.

phoenix Sun 22-May-16 22:58:54

No, still considering the pros and cons, but then, I do have a tendency to spend so long sitting on the fence that I get splinters on my bottom!blushconfused

durhamjen Sun 22-May-16 22:56:20

Cameron has more clout than many of the other leaders because he makes himself a nuisance. However, they all have vetos, no matter how big or small their country.

durhamjen Sun 22-May-16 22:53:13

That's not true, Day6. You cannot just have one MEP for your area.
There are twelve constituencies and even the smallest has three. That's Northern Ireland. Wales has four. London has eight. Scotland and Yorkshire have six each.

Day6 Sun 22-May-16 22:39:13

durhamjen - In a democracy you can get rid of the government any time you want to, not just every five years.

Well, if we were being asked to decide if we wanted to stay in the European Union for the next five years, it might put a different complexion on things. However, we aren't, and I (and many others it would seem) just don't know who is in charge of the EU, so to speak. It's supposedly a joint endeavour, but who heads up the EU?

Where is the democracy, because I don't see how I could object to EU rulings because I wouldn't know where to address my concerns. The one MEP who represents my bit of the UK isn't likely to have any clout, if Cameron is powerless.

My one MEP is sitting alongside Germans, French, Polish, Lithuanian, Bulgarian, Slovakian, Estonian, Latvian etc etc etc representatives deciding what the UK has to

Is little old me going to be able to say to any of them "Hang on a minute, why should that happen in the UK?" and have my concerns heard?

I appreciate that British politics is the same. I can talk to my MP but I have little influence on what the government decides in any given situation. I can protest, but democracy is a strange beast. It allows me my say, but even a whole host of protesting people won't sway a government unless it has some sort of leverage or authority.

I feel we have lost our power and our way if we allow a body of unknown Europeans to insist on a uniformity we have to abide by.

We are objecting already to so many EU directives. The referendum is going to be our last chance to make a difference and for our objections regarding the EU to be noted and acted on.

The referendum is a democratic process and a real bit of UK democracy. We must value it and I dearly hope we turn our backs on the EU, for good.