Many people think that the whole of Syria is being bombarded or overrun by fanatics, this is not the case. The disruption to this rich country is only taking place in specific areas, the majority of the country is not particularly affected and therefore many could move there. At the start of the conflict, those affected moved to neighbouring countries as crossing the border was nearer than moving further inland. If you check the map you will see that in general the conflict is mainly around border regions.
The mass Exodus now is more to do with the relaxation of visa requirements and the probable false understanding that Europe equals Utopia. Support for displaced in safe havens within their own country should be a serious consideration, just as during the war here children and needy were evacuated from London and other cities to safer havens within the country.
Those able should consider what their home country should be, and should fight for it rather than allow it to be overtaken by foreign fanatics.
Okay, Germany's population is in decline so they require extra hands to maintain their workforce, but this is not the case for all of Europe and expecting other countries (who, in some instances are poorer than Syria) to accept the overflow of Germany's generous invitation is a cause for concern.
External military intervention will not achieve anything other than to escalate this civil war to global proportions.because there is no clear vision for the country due to the multi sectarian infighting.
I am not saying no to refugees, but think migration to a foreign country and culture should be the last not first resort. The UK and the U.S. Are the biggest supporters of in-country aid. Other countries globally should step up and meet their obligations to provide in-country support which is acknowledged would reduce the flow of migrants.