para 1. line 1: it should, of course, be 'economics'
Angela Rayner is a scrounger, grifter and shameless hypocrite.
Burnham to tell schools in England to adapt teaching to local business needs- what do you think?
Sign up to Gransnet Daily
Our free daily newsletter full of hot threads, competitions and discounts
Subscribe
On the Department of Enterprise Trade and Investment's website I found the following:
"In general, anybody who carries out at least one hour’s paid work in a week, or who is temporarily away from a job (e.g. on holiday) is in employment. Also counted as in employment are people on government-supported training schemes and people who do unpaid work for their family’ business. Those who are out of work but do not meet the criteria of unemployment are economically inactive."
I was amazed that it's only necessary to work one hour a week in order to be classified as employed. One wonders also whether one of the purposes of the government supported training schemes is to remove those participating from the unemployment statistics.
para 1. line 1: it should, of course, be 'economics'
I remember very clearly the first essay I was set in my first term at university studying eeonomics.
Essentially it asked 'If at a time of high unemployment one man by constant searching can find himself a job, why cannot all unemployed men?' The answer is obvious.
Similarly, if people lower their expectations, assuming that they are reasonable and well founded, that will not help. Employers are very unwilling to take on a graduate, for example, in a low paid clerical or retail permanent post because they believe, probably with justification, that they will continue to look for more appropriate work and will leave a low paid, low skill job as soon as they possible can.
durhamjen Yes, why don't they? The figures are totally misleading.
Eloethan, just reread your OP. That's how Osborne and Cameron could claim a rise in employment last week. I wish the opposition would make more noise about it.
Thanks Riverwalk, really looking forward to the course and nursing again. I was very actively looking at any job (am main breadwinner), and definitely not a high level manager's post, whilst awaiting the outcome of the application to return to practice.
I think it's the attitude of the staff at the Job Centre that shocked me so much, hopefully not endemic in that organisation.
Like Phoenix, I would have been surprised if they'd found a job I hadn't already seen, I spent hours on the Internet.
It's strange how everybody says the unemployed should get themselves jobs. In fact only 0.7% of the government's spending is on unemployment.
The unemployed should lower their expectations to what, exactly, Ceesnan?
A zero hours or minimum wage contract? 4 times as much money is spent on bolstering the low pay economy than on unemployment benefit.
This drags in ATOS I'm afraid, but when DH was off sick about 6 years ago he had to go for one of their assessments. He had a torn rotator cuff which meant he couldn't use his left arm and couldn't drive his HGV or work unloading lorries. Everything they did was geared towards proving he was fit to find a job. What they refused to understand was that he HAD a job, he was NOT unemployed, he just needed money when his sick pay ran out while he recovered enough to drive again.
I hope they are too Charleygirl.
soontobe I know one person who is unemployed and unfortunately lives in a part of the country where any job is scarce. I am ever hopeful that person will be successful very soon.
PS Meant to add, that the staff knew that I was taking every step possible to find a job, so there was nothing that they could have found for me to apply for that I hadn't already found for myself.
In all fairness to them, some of the people that I saw there on my signing on days seemed to have little or no interest in actually getting a job, which must surely make the staff a bit miffed to say the least!
Sorry for the delay in responding, but no River they didn't! However they were realistic (to a degree) in steering me away from jobs.
If I might explain, at the time a supermarket was advertising for staff, I mentioned this to the Jobcentre advisor and she shook her head, because she understood that I might be offered (for example) 4 hour shifts, which taking into account the distance I would have to travel (by car, no bus route) meant that financially it wouldn't have been a sensible option.
This contrasts with other peoples experiences where the staff encourage you to take anything, just because it will take you off the list and make their figures look better.
Hope this makes sense!
South durhamjen.
But it is an area that is eligible for EU money, so that may be what is making the difference lately.
I live just outside Chester and I can't think of anyone I know that isn't working, that is of course if they want to work. I think a lot of people who are unemployed need to lower their expectations a little.
Same here, vampire.
Where do you live, soontobe?
Vampire and I are up North.
I know lots of people who are unemployed and desperately seeking work. I also know people on zero hour contracts which means they never know from one week to the next when/if they will work and what, if anything, they will earn.
One hour a week is ludicrous.
Having said that, I dont know about anyone else on gransnet, but I dont think I know anyone who is unemployed at the moment.
Job centre staff seem to be undertrained to me.
Good luck with the course loopy.
I did it 10 years' ago, after a gap of 17 years - best thing I ever did.
By the way, UKCC is now NMC!
I do not think many MPs will have to go to the jobcentre, GillT, unfortunately. They get an allowance of 1 month's pay for each year they have been in parliament, and £44,000 to close down their offices. So someone who loses his or her seat after only five years will get nearly £28,000. I think that is twice statutory redundancy pay for anyone else.
Good luck, loopylou. Working in the NHS these days? You're brave.
Luckily I have just heard that I have been accepted on a Return to Nursing course starting in January, so once I get my UKCC PIN back, I can return to working in the NHS.
My last job was as a high level manager in the voluntary sector; told job centre I was prepared to do any job and response was 'you're too highly qualified for most jobs!'
Goodness knows how depressing it must be for the long term unemployed. Am still struggling to comprehend the attitudes of those supposedly helping the job seekers to return to work.
A friend's husband worked at a Job Centre for 25 years then he had a major back injury and became disabled to the point where he could no longer work. He suddenly found himself on the other side of the benefits fence and was treated appallingly even by people he'd previously worked with. He hadn't realised how 'us and them' it was until he suddenly became 'them' rather than 'us'.
He finally got his benefits sorted out but felt it was only because he knew the system inside out. If he'd been an ordinary person he wouldn't have got his entitlements.
But did they ever find you a job phoenix?
I have to say that my experience of my local Jobcentre was a very positive one, and the staff were helpful and supportive, but it does seem that is the exception unfortunately.
When I was made redundant 11 years ago I went to sign on - don't think JSA was means-tested then - mainly so my National Insurance wouldn't be affected.
In the ensuing 6 weeks or so I went on a couple of rubbish seminars and training days. One of them was supposedly a computer-package course - I left at lunchtime when the chap who was 'tutoring' me (just him and me in the class) told me that HTML stood for Hotmail.
Seems not much has changed in terms of quality.
If this is how it is for articulate people who can speak for themselves and can access other sources to find out their rights, just how on earth do less able people manage? Maybe a few MPs could go and register at their local job centre when they lose their seats in May next year, and get an idea of the humiliation and degradation involved in asking for help from a system which we have been paying into for years. Whenever I register a job on the job centre website I get inundated with applications, many of whom obviously haven't read the job description and are not going to be suitable ( i am not specific about experience or anything like that, but applicants must have a driving licence) I asked one interviewee why this was and she told me that she had been instructed to apply for a minimum of 40 jobs a week or her JSA would be stopped, therefore she had applied for hundreds of jobs from lorry driver to slaughterman despite looking for an admin position within school hours. This whole system is a failure, both for job seekers and employers; I have offered many interviews to candidates who seem to be what I am looking for and many, if not most, fail to attend the booked interview. It is all just window dressing and a complete nonsense.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.