Gransnet forums

Ask a gran

Fashionable words!

(172 Posts)
Flowerofthewest Sun 08-Sept-13 20:29:06

What do other GNetters think of all of the latest descriptions of things we took for granted. The comment about NCT made me think. I will list a few:

Babies now have a 'Growth Spurt' (mine just grew and fed accordingly)
Babies now suffer from Separation Anxiety (mine were clingy at times)
Breasts now have 'Fore milk, something in the middle and something at the end (mine just fed the baby until it was full)
Babies have to bond with the father before anything else in the world (mine bonded as and when daddy was home from work)
Some babies 'co-sleep' (mine sometimes slept with me but mostly in their crib by the bed)
Some babies are being brought up with something called 'Attachment' (mine were put in a sling and carried round)
Dads seem to need and update on everything Baby does via text several times a day so that he doesn't feel neglected.

There must be more strange and wonderful things going on in bringing up babies these days. Any thoughts? grin

thatbags Sat 14-Sept-13 19:36:11

Have we? I'd forgotten. Anyhow, no-one needs to stay a prude unless they wish to.

But why is it odd? You didn't answer the question. Well-off women used to get poor women to feed their babies so breastfeeding someone else's kid is hardly something new and unheard of.

Why are you shocked?

Greatnan Sat 14-Sept-13 19:37:14

Of course you can be prudish, Ana - as long as you don't use your own feelings to criticise anybody else's family.

Ana Sat 14-Sept-13 19:37:32

I didn't say I was shocked.

thatbags Sat 14-Sept-13 19:38:26

Sorry. Odd. Why is it odd?

Have you read The Grapes of Wrath?

Ana Sat 14-Sept-13 19:39:03

And I didn't criticise anyone's family. I said I thought it was odd, that's all. No need to get so defensive - obviously I'm in the minority here and I accept that.

Greatnan Sat 14-Sept-13 19:43:59

Good.

thatbags Sat 14-Sept-13 19:44:37

Why do you think it's odd? Please.

thatbags Sat 14-Sept-13 19:45:09

And have you read The Grapes of Wrath?

thatbags Sat 14-Sept-13 19:46:51

If not, you may wonder why I ask. But the end of the book is significant to your finding breastfeeding any but one's own baby odd. www.shmoop.com/grapes-of-wrath/ending.html

Greatnan Sat 14-Sept-13 19:49:33

Thanks for the link, bags - now you have sent me back to re-read Steinbeck!

Penstemmon Sat 14-Sept-13 19:55:22

Not sure if they actually fed each others babies but DD2 certainly shared milk . She produced masses & if DD1s baby was hungry and there was spare milk in the fridge the other baby had it. She also gave milk to the hospital for a few weeks. Think they would have been happy to feed each others..certainly DD2 who found BF easy. DD1 struggled a bit at first.

Ana Sat 14-Sept-13 19:57:58

Sorry, thatbags - had to go off for a restorative bowl of cereal...

Whatever I say will be criticised and dissected, so I'm not going to try and answer your first question. As to The Grapes of Wrath, yes I did read it years ago and obviously breast-milk could be a life-saver in that kind of extreme situation.

thatbags Sat 14-Sept-13 20:01:10

It's not criticism to ask why you think something odd. It's just a question.

Ana Sat 14-Sept-13 20:02:00

Not you, thatbags.

Stansgran Sat 14-Sept-13 20:10:54

I still thought GofW was utterly creepy. Wet nurses never went round BFing starving men as far as we know or women for that matter. I felt only a man could write that. Wonder what they would think onthe parent company . I always wondered if they were so short of food how could she produce so much milk.

Greatnan Sat 14-Sept-13 20:14:38

The parent company? I don't follow.

MiceElf Sat 14-Sept-13 20:20:39

Ana, I'm not having a pop at you. But why do you find it odd? I'd really like to know, as I think it's a lovely thing to do for a sister.

JessM Sat 14-Sept-13 21:21:40

I think the human race would not have survived if our neolithic ancestors had not fed each others babies - when mothers died, when they were sick, when they did not have enough milk, when they went out fishing etc Grandmothers must often have stepped into the breach. Women will have been lactating almost permanently from the time they give birth to their first child until they died.
It is not that common in our culture in current times, so it seems strange to many people I guess.

pinkprincess Mon 16-Sept-13 00:59:20

The royal family used wet nurses, certainly in Queen Mary(present Queen's grandmother)'s time.Royalty, and other's of high birth, considered it animal like to breastfeed and hired wet nurses to do it.

















































0

pinkprincess Mon 16-Sept-13 01:00:07

Sorry if I have made a big gap, laptop playing up.

Greatnan Mon 16-Sept-13 06:33:08

Pink Princess - sometimes when I hear about people complaining about mothers discreetly feeding their babies I think they still think it is 'animal-like'.

JessM Mon 16-Sept-13 07:01:22

Or obscene maybe. You get the record for on screen "silence" on GN PP grin
Reminds me of the time the Archers was introduced thus:
"and now we are going over to Ambridge where Jill is enjoying a moment of peace and quiet" There then followed several minutes of total silence, due to a technical problem. grin

Greatnan Mon 16-Sept-13 07:08:03

Oddly enough, it is sometimes the people who see nothing wrong in Page Three girls who find the use of breasts for their natural purpose obscene!

Greatnan Mon 16-Sept-13 07:08:38

Oddly enough, it is sometimes the people who see nothing wrong in Page Three girls who find the use of breasts for their natural purpose obscene!

thatbags Mon 16-Sept-13 07:14:36

It is animal-like. We not only are animal-like, we are animals, and we are mammal animal. So it'd be odd if what we did wasn't mammal animal-like.

As a student I babysat for someone who said she didn't breast feed because it made her feel like an animal. My immediate thought was: You are an animal.

Some people really disconnect from reality.