Gransnet forums

AIBU

Daughter &Husband won’t let anyone see newborn

(445 Posts)
Cookieof4 Wed 07-Aug-24 21:25:11

My daughter and her husband welcomed their first baby 4 days ago. We were told in advance that they didn’t want anyone to come to the hospital. What we didn’t expect was short texts stating “she has been born” and “doing well” with no other information. They have been home for 2 days and we haven’t received a phone and they won’t answer any either. We haven’t received a picture and they haven’t told us her name. All we know is she is healthy. Our daughter hasn’t contacted us at all. Are we in the wrong for feeling hurt? How do we even deal with this? Our whole family just feels terrible.

maddyone Mon 12-Aug-24 23:47:38

Some of these comments on this thread are attacking other posters and are way out of order.

maddyone Mon 12-Aug-24 23:44:58

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Hithere Mon 12-Aug-24 22:30:07

If stalking them with a note is bad enough, using the police for these manipulative purposes is time out worthy

Very very bad suggestions

Ali08 Mon 12-Aug-24 22:14:35

I'd pop a note through their door asking them to contact you one way or another or you'll be thinking they are not alright!!
It's one thing to want to spend time alone with their baby at first, but it's quite another to suddenly drop contact with family and close friends!!
OR, you could ask police to do a wellness check on them, just to let them know you're concerned!

MissInterpreted Mon 12-Aug-24 21:47:54

Feverjo

You have a very strange way of defining the life choices of other women, but hey ho. Here we are smile

I haven't defined anyone's life choices. But I'm bowing out now and leaving the rest of the dogs to fight over whatever bones remain...

Feverjo Mon 12-Aug-24 21:41:14

But I digress, don't want to distract from the topic at hand.

Feverjo Mon 12-Aug-24 21:40:47

Yes, you cannot seem to stay away from commenting here. Dogs to bones indeed lol. Plural.

Callistemon213 Mon 12-Aug-24 21:39:16

Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.

Feverjo Mon 12-Aug-24 21:37:25

You have a very strange way of defining the life choices of other women, but hey ho. Here we are smile

MissInterpreted Mon 12-Aug-24 21:08:07

You have a very strange definition of 'controlling'.

Feverjo Mon 12-Aug-24 20:54:44

I never called the mother controlling. Please don't put words in my mouth (fingers). That was in reference to the unhinged comments here condemning this young woman. This young mother has been called 'rude' 'precious' and other names. She has been put down for the possibility that she may want time with just her baby and husband. Just because she isn't here to defend herself doesn't make it any less nasty.

I called people engaging in this nasty name-calling controlling because it's controlling to refuse to accept another adult has the right to choose her own path during her postpartum period. The idea that it is wrong to not follow what others have done in the past is very controlling. Bitterness at another person's freewill is controlling.

Fleurpepper Mon 12-Aug-24 20:31:15

Well, why are are accusations of 'controlling women' any more appropriate than thinking that there is a possibility, of a controlling partner?

You accusation that the mother is 'controlling, or that any of us are 'attacking a postpartum woman, is totally out of order here.

Feverjo Mon 12-Aug-24 20:20:14

Fleurpepper

It is perfectly appropriate to look at any possible reasons. Why does it bother you that much. I feel there is an issue there with you and your past, perhaps.

It's not appropriate to pull accusations of abuse as a possibility in a perfectly normal scenario where there is no indication of such, especially to a mother who already rightly or wrongly upset. Tact is a wonderful thing in life.

You can 'feel' all you like. You're far from on base. I do have an issue with controlling women attacking postpartum women. It's nasty.

Feverjo Mon 12-Aug-24 20:16:50

Callistemon213

Feverjo

MissInterpreted

Some people are like a dog with a bone on this thread. Jeez, let it go...

Agreed. The usual suspects with their negative views of young mums and different choices surely come out.

You've never thought it could mean you?

🤔

It's called sarcasm. I'm sorry you didn't pickup on that.

Norah Mon 12-Aug-24 20:16:17

Fleurpepper

It is perfectly appropriate to look at any possible reasons. Why does it bother you that much. I feel there is an issue there with you and your past, perhaps.

Agreed.

There could be any reason, or none.

It's only been a week, if I count correctly. OP has been informed, if I read correctly. Perhaps whatever others seem to find so unacceptable to the texts has changed. Has OP returned again?

Fleurpepper Mon 12-Aug-24 20:03:13

It is perfectly appropriate to look at any possible reasons. Why does it bother you that much. I feel there is an issue there with you and your past, perhaps.

Callistemon213 Mon 12-Aug-24 20:02:37

Feverjo

MissInterpreted

Some people are like a dog with a bone on this thread. Jeez, let it go...

Agreed. The usual suspects with their negative views of young mums and different choices surely come out.

You've never thought it could mean you?

🤔

Feverjo Mon 12-Aug-24 19:53:27

*pull many random reasons out of thin air.

Feverjo Mon 12-Aug-24 19:52:21

Fleurpepper

Feverjo

maddyone

Fleurpepper I agree with you. Coercive control is real and extremely damaging. I would also be concerned if I was not allowed to see my daughter in these circumstances.

Of course it may not be coercive control, but as mother had been with her daughter only the week before, if she was unable to see her daughter within a few days, alarm bells would be ringing.

Projection is unhealthy. Sorry for your experience but you seem to mention it nearly every time a grandparent complains about not having their way. Not everyone's situation is your daughters. There is no reason whatsoever to bring up coercive control here. None at all.

I did. And nothing to do with my experience, but it could be one of the reasons here. How can you be so sure this is not what it is about in this case. What is your reasoning here?

We could pull many random "possible reasons" but that doesn't make it appropriate to put the idea in the OP's head without warrant. There's no reason to believe that your assertion isn't far-fetched based on the limited details here.

Norah Mon 12-Aug-24 19:45:17

Cookieof4

My daughter and her husband welcomed their first baby 4 days ago. We were told in advance that they didn’t want anyone to come to the hospital. What we didn’t expect was short texts stating “she has been born” and “doing well” with no other information. They have been home for 2 days and we haven’t received a phone and they won’t answer any either. We haven’t received a picture and they haven’t told us her name. All we know is she is healthy. Our daughter hasn’t contacted us at all. Are we in the wrong for feeling hurt? How do we even deal with this? Our whole family just feels terrible.

Have you all not read the OP?

She clearly states when baby was born and when they went home, when she received texts "she has been born" and "doing well"

Surely encapsulating the situation!

Smileless2012 Mon 12-Aug-24 19:38:08

Yes it could be one of the reasons Fleurpepper.

Fleurpepper Mon 12-Aug-24 19:31:47

Feverjo

maddyone

Fleurpepper I agree with you. Coercive control is real and extremely damaging. I would also be concerned if I was not allowed to see my daughter in these circumstances.

Of course it may not be coercive control, but as mother had been with her daughter only the week before, if she was unable to see her daughter within a few days, alarm bells would be ringing.

Projection is unhealthy. Sorry for your experience but you seem to mention it nearly every time a grandparent complains about not having their way. Not everyone's situation is your daughters. There is no reason whatsoever to bring up coercive control here. None at all.

I did. And nothing to do with my experience, but it could be one of the reasons here. How can you be so sure this is not what it is about in this case. What is your reasoning here?

MissInterpreted Mon 12-Aug-24 19:01:29

grin grin grin

Feverjo Mon 12-Aug-24 18:54:12

Dickens

MissInterpreted

Dickens

MissInterpreted

Some people are like a dog with a bone on this thread. Jeez, let it go...

'Some people' like to debate the matter and respond to other posts on it. It may well become repetitive, but isn't that the nature of social media?

It is indeed, but some people need to learn where to draw the line. There's a fine line between repetition and it turning into a lecture.

Why not address those people individually then?

Because passive aggression is "easier".

Feverjo Mon 12-Aug-24 18:52:33

Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.