I think that the OP set out the problem quite eloquently. It's quite touching that the opinions and advice that followed, along with details of some other sad but long-accepted situations, show just how genuinely kind and supportive GN posters can be. It's then always an unpleasant shock when the 2 'usual suspects" crash land into the thread displaying such anger and almost contempt for the feelings of the original poster. "Why?" is normally their opening weapon of choice - it's doubtful that the OP would have any understanding as to why she has been greeted with such apparent dislike !
I do agree with namsnanny's comment when she asserts that facts are being commented upon through someone else's bias I think they really are, because if you have any thread on here dealing with alleged manipulation, parental difficulties, estrangement, family problems, the same duo often arrive - filled with sufficient rage to convince enough of us that it can only be their own past and personal circumstances driving what they say every time. And there's a pattern - anger and contempt for what others say, a refusal to accurately read or accept what the OP is saying, a determination to argue a point which, with respect, is only their own view on a total stranger's problems, an argument as to what the poster really means, accusations of covering up facts - about which they have no clue! Clearly a raw nerve is touched every single time which prevents them being able to post in a calm way or one which respects (or politely ignores) what others have said. Discussion - when they are involved - is usually impossible. Debate? Forget it.
Now, if these were professional opinions, it still would not engender much respect : but as experts there would be no need to "shout", argue or be abusive in an effort to beat others down into accepting a particular argument or viewpoint. And if this double act from hell were experts, there would be no doubt as to their capacity to properly explain their conclusions. It would certainly be interesting to know what professional experience and qualification they both could claim, the length of time in any professional career would support and prompt the views given, what books published, what researched studies have been made, what papers have been written and the depth of client or clinical experience and research in any particular field are being drawn upon to support the phrases and opinions so stridently expressed here..
If, as I expect, most posters' views on here are given as a result of personal and life experience and made in a genuine effort to discuss the dilemma which the OP has set out, there can be no reason for any of the anger and abuse which these two posters utilise far too often : disrupting threads and sometimes having their posts deleted. Basically, looking to start fights. Does this make them feel better in some way? How can this be even remotely helpful? It will certainly be no surprise to most of us, I should think, if my post now engenders abuse or another deleted post. It would be great to think that I am wrong and that things might change. But...?
Sadly, such anger and arrogance will do little to encourage individuals to seek opinion or advice on GN - perhaps when they genuinely need that; it also insults the intelligence of those who are interested and contribute regularly to this forum and do have a great deal of warmth, common sense and support to impart. Seeing a very interesting thread tampered with in this way is completely counter-productive and I genuinely hope that it will stop.