I doubt many of these families have children to get benefits, although the evidence given at the trial of the parents, whose arson killed six of their children, suggests that some do.
However, all parents receive an increase in their child benefits when they have more children In an overpopulated country and world I can think of no good reason why we should be subsidising childbearing, beyond replacement level.
The argument that always comes up when there is talk of limiting child support to two children is that we should not penalise the parents of larger families because it is the children that suffer but I am sure it is not beyond the bounds of reason to develop a policy that affects the parents but not the children. perhaps the extra child benefit could be seen as a loan that will be repaid through income or a reduction in benefits, including any state pension. after the child reaches 18, rather like the student loan, the supernumary children will, by definition be the younger children so the family will not be penalised while they are still supporting all their children
Chat GPT - worth getting to grips with it








