Generally speaking, the law exists to prevent people being cruel to others.
However, grandparents have no rights under the law. Should they have,or should it be possible, in exceptional circumstances, for them to have access to the legal system to be granted rights of access?
If you are a grandparent, you must have been a parent, and I know, as a parent, that I should have resented the thought that my parents had any rights over my children. Obviously, though, as a grandparent I see the matter somewhat differently.
I do not have any problem with seeing my daughters and grandchildren, but my younger daughter, who is a bit stroppy like me, does like to remind me on occasion that she is the one with all the rights. Technically, she is correct, and I can't blame her for telling me so, because, as I said, she is like me.
However, the sovereignty of parents over their children is really only a societal convenience. Parents have all the rights just so that they can assume all the responsibilities for their children, and the state doesn't have to.
Even there, of course, if parents abuse their rights over their children, the state has the power to remove those children from their care.
In the end, parental rights should not and are not allowed to overrule children's rights. Whilst the difficult daughters-in-law in these cases do not appear to be abusing their children physically, they are certainly depriving them of the love and care of their grandparents.
Surely, in these sorts of situations, grandparents' rights should reflect the rights of their grandchildren within the legal system?